{"id":12825,"date":"2023-05-23T10:02:24","date_gmt":"2023-05-23T10:02:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/?p=12825"},"modified":"2026-07-17T09:43:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-17T09:43:10","slug":"dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Why did the Supreme Court decide to deprive a citizen of the right to a court?"},"content":{"rendered":"<article class=\"kk-article\">\n<p class=\"kk-lead\">Critical commentary on the Supreme Court's decision of 29 March 2023 (case file no. III CZ 427\/22) stating that filing a document with the court via the internet (e-PUAP) does not produce any legal effects. Through extreme formalism, in an era of ubiquitous digitalisation, citizens are being denied the right to have their cases heard on their merits.<\/p>\n<div class=\"kk-box\">\n<p class=\"kk-box-title\">\ud83d\udca1 Key takeaways from the Supreme Court ruling<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In the Polish civil procedure, the service of a procedural document via the e-PUAP platform (instead of traditional mail or a court registry office) has been recognised by the Supreme Court as legally valid. <strong>futile<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Instead of treating this as a formal deficiency (lack of a handwritten signature), which can be rectified within 7 days, the Supreme Court has completely invalidated such documents, automatically rejecting the appeals.<\/li>\n<li>This approach infringes upon a citizen's constitutional right of access to court, particularly in light of restricted post office opening hours.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<nav class=\"kk-toc\" aria-label=\"Contents\">\n<p class=\"kk-toc-title\">\ud83d\udccb Contents<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"#dlaczego-problem\">Dlaczego problem ze z\u0142o\u017ceniem dokument\u00f3w narasta?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#motywacja\">What should be the motivation of the adjudicating panel?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#wykladnia\">Potential consequences of a pro-citizen ruling (by analogy)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#kompromis\">Potential effects of a compromise ruling<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#gwarancje\">Procedural guarantees and deprivation of rights<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#formalizm\">The disease of formalism afflicting Polish courts<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/nav>\n<blockquote class=\"kk-quote\"><p><strong>The Supreme Court ruled that a submission via E-PUAP has no legal effect. No one considers the problem this ruling leaves the citizen with. What matters is that the court found a procedural reason not to resolve the case.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h1>Filing of a document via ePUAP invalid? Commentary on the Supreme Court's decision<\/h1>\n<h2 id=\"dlaczego-problem\">Dlaczego problem ze z\u0142o\u017ceniem dokument\u00f3w narasta?<\/h2>\n<p>The subject is well-known to practitioners. In the career of every legal representative, as well as an ordinary citizen, the need to submit a document on the last day of a deadline has arisen many times (e.g., due to sudden illness or a short time for analysis). During this time, Poczta Polska S.A., instead of raising the standard of services, is closing 24-hour branches (even in such large cities as Krakow). A citizen, who by law has until 11:59 PM on the last day of the deadline to post a document, <em>de facto<\/em> This is unfair because the last post closes at, say, 9 PM. It's no wonder, then, that desperate citizens and lawyers began seeking refuge in the state e-PUAP system.<\/p>\n<p>However, in 2023, the Supreme Court in a civilised country in the heart of Europe decided that this was absolutely unacceptable.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"motywacja\">What should be the motivation of the adjudicating panel?<\/h2>\n<p>Judges swear to \"faithfully serve the Republic of Poland, to uphold the law\". In accordance with the Constitution \u2013 the Republic is the common good of all citizens, a state established so that we may live better. Therefore, the key question that Supreme Court judges should ask themselves when taking on a case is: how to rule in this legal gap in a way that protects the rights of the citizen?<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"wykladnia\">Potential consequences of a pro-citizen ruling (by analogy)<\/h2>\n<p>If the Supreme Court were to deem, in its benevolence, that since almost all documents can be successfully submitted to public administration offices via e-PUAP for years, then the principle of a democratic state governed by the rule of law (as well as the right to a court) necessitates the acceptance of such correspondence by courts as well. The application of interpretation <em>by analogy<\/em> would fill the gap left by a sluggish legislator.<\/p>\n<p>What's more, such an innovative ruling would finally force the Ministry of Justice to accelerate the computerisation of civil courts (which today can serve documents via an information portal, but cannot formally accept them in return within the ordinary process).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"kompromis\">Potential effects of a compromise ruling<\/h2>\n<p>Even without agreement on full digitalisation, the Supreme Court judges could have maintained the compromise that has been in place for years. According to this, a document sent via e-PUAP is filed on time, but it is treated as a document with a formal defect in the form of <strong>lack of personal signature<\/strong>The court should then call for the remedying of this defect within 7 days. This was an excellent \"emergency exit\" that saved citizens' constitutional guarantees, and was not abused on a large scale.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"gwarancje\">Procedural guarantees and deprivation of rights<\/h2>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Supreme Court ruled something completely to the contrary: the document produces no effects whatsoever. An electronically filed appeal or complaint lands in the bin, and the citizen irrevocably loses the right to a two-instance review of their case. And it makes no difference whether they made a mistake themselves, or if their representative made a mistake.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"formalizm\">The disease of formalism afflicting Polish courts<\/h2>\n<p>This ruling is an exceptionally glaring example of the disease of extreme formalism, reducing the court process to a mindless formality. From daily practice, it is clear that many judges are just waiting for a technical error by a citizen (e.g., incorrect payment, wrong margin, delivery error) in order to instantly dismiss the case for purely procedural reasons. The statistics add up, the case is closed, and the judge has less work. And substantive justice takes a back seat.<\/p>\n<p>The denial of citizens' right to a substantive examination of their case simply because a document arrived via cable rather than in a paper envelope through the Polish Post is a cause for shame. Justice was meant to serve citizens, not to isolate itself from them with a wall of anachronistic regulations.<\/p>\n<div class=\"kk-author-box\"><strong>Author of the commentary: Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski, Legal Advisor.<\/strong> (Critical opinion on the Supreme Court's decision, file reference III CZ 427\/22).<\/div>\n<\/article>\n\n\n<div class=\"kk-star-ratings kksr-auto kksr-align-left kksr-valign-bottom\"\n    data-payload='{&quot;align&quot;:&quot;left&quot;,&quot;id&quot;:&quot;12825&quot;,&quot;slug&quot;:&quot;default&quot;,&quot;valign&quot;:&quot;bottom&quot;,&quot;ignore&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;reference&quot;:&quot;auto&quot;,&quot;class&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;count&quot;:&quot;7&quot;,&quot;legendonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;readonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;score&quot;:&quot;4&quot;,&quot;starsonly&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;best&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;gap&quot;:&quot;5&quot;,&quot;greet&quot;:&quot;Rate this post&quot;,&quot;legend&quot;:&quot;4\\\/5 - (7 votes)&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:&quot;24&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:&quot;113.5&quot;,&quot;_legend&quot;:&quot;{score}\\\/{best} - ({count} {votes})&quot;,&quot;font_factor&quot;:&quot;1.25&quot;}'>\n            \n<div class=\"kksr-stars\">\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-inactive\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"1\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"2\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"3\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"4\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" data-star=\"5\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n<div class=\"kksr-stars-active\" style=\"width: 113.5px;\">\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n            <div class=\"kksr-star\" style=\"padding-right: 5px\">\n            \n\n<div class=\"kksr-icon\" style=\"width: 24px; height: 24px;\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n                \n\n<div class=\"kksr-legend\" style=\"font-size: 19.2px;\">\n            4\/5 - (7 votes)    <\/div>\n    <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Critical commentary on the Supreme Court's ruling of 29 March 2023 (case ref. III CZ 427\/22) stating that the submission of documents to court via the internet (e-PUAP) has no legal effect. Due to extreme formalism, in an era of ubiquitous digitisation, citizens are being denied the right to have their cases substantively heard. \ud83d\udca1 Key takeaways from the Supreme Court's ruling In Polish civil procedure\u2026<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Why did the Supreme Court decide to deprive a citizen of the right to a court?<\/span> Read More \u00bb<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":12828,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,32],"tags":[],"uslugi-categories":[],"class_list":["post-12825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-porady-prawne","category-prawo-cywilne"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v20.10 (Yoast SEO v23.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"K\u0142odzi\u0144ski Kancelaria\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100063452360012\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"696\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@KlodzinskiPiotr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@KlodzinskiPiotr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/f0a138d9b8e19a879d49857458dc6c99\"},\"headline\":\"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/\"},\"wordCount\":856,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Porady Prawne - Blog Kancelarii Prawnej\",\"Prawo Cywilne\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/\",\"name\":\"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":696,\"caption\":\"jedna gwiazka - z\u0142e orzeczenie s\u0105du najwy\u017cszego\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/\",\"name\":\"K\u0142odzi\u0144ski Kancelaria\",\"description\":\"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego z Warszawy\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego - Piotra K\u0142odzi\u0144skiego\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/klodzinski-kancelaria-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/klodzinski-kancelaria-logo.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":58,\"caption\":\"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego - Piotra K\u0142odzi\u0144skiego\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100063452360012\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/KlodzinskiPiotr\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/f0a138d9b8e19a879d49857458dc6c99\",\"name\":\"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44cde8fb58c18d734bbdc5f59bf306a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44cde8fb58c18d734bbdc5f59bf306a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski\"},\"description\":\"Radca Prawny, Za\u0142o\u017cyciel Kancelarii\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?","description":"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?","og_description":"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.","og_url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/why-did-the-supreme-court-decide-to-deprive-a-citizen-of-the-right-to-go-to-court\/","og_site_name":"K\u0142odzi\u0144ski Kancelaria","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100063452360012","article_published_time":"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":696,"url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@KlodzinskiPiotr","twitter_site":"@KlodzinskiPiotr","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski","Estimated reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/"},"author":{"name":"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/f0a138d9b8e19a879d49857458dc6c99"},"headline":"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?","datePublished":"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/"},"wordCount":856,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg","articleSection":["Porady Prawne - Blog Kancelarii Prawnej","Prawo Cywilne"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/","url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/","name":"Dlaczego SN postanowi\u0142 odebra\u0107 obywatelowi prawo do s\u0105du?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg","datePublished":"2023-05-23T10:02:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-17T09:43:10+00:00","description":"Najnowsze orzeczenie S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego, jednoznacznie zakazuje wnoszenia pism do s\u0105du przez Internet lub przez E-PUAP. Komentarz krytyczny.","inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/dlaczego-sn-postanowil-odebrac-obywatelowi-prawo-do-sadu\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/criticism-g27edcec93_1280.jpg","width":1280,"height":696,"caption":"jedna gwiazka - z\u0142e orzeczenie s\u0105du najwy\u017cszego"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#website","url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/","name":"K\u0142odzi\u0144ski Kancelaria","description":"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego z Warszawy","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#organization","name":"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego - Piotra K\u0142odzi\u0144skiego","url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/klodzinski-kancelaria-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/klodzinski-kancelaria-logo.png","width":200,"height":58,"caption":"Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego - Piotra K\u0142odzi\u0144skiego"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100063452360012","https:\/\/x.com\/KlodzinskiPiotr"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/f0a138d9b8e19a879d49857458dc6c99","name":"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44cde8fb58c18d734bbdc5f59bf306a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44cde8fb58c18d734bbdc5f59bf306a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Piotr K\u0142odzi\u0144ski"},"description":"Radca Prawny, Za\u0142o\u017cyciel Kancelarii","sameAs":["https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12825"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12825\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12828"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12825"},{"taxonomy":"uslugi-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klodzinskikancelaria.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/uslugi-categories?post=12825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}